The Sticky Holster

Every now and again something comes around that appears to be too good to be true.  Okay, you known darn well you shouldn’t buy it, because you know the darn thing is not going to live up to the hype, but, you cast caution to the wind and pull the trigger (figuratively speaking).  So it went with the Sticky Holster for me.

The Sticky Holster

On the video the demonstrator put the holster in place in a pair of jogging shorts and then jumped up and down and ran and then drew flawlessly from the holster.  The holster, on the video, stayed put.

“Sure it did,” you’re saying.  Well, videos don’t lie.  So I bought it.

So, here’s the theory of operation of the Sticky Holster.  It has some sticky foam on the outside (like those things that hold your iPhone in the car) and it’s supposed to hold it up next to your body and your pants at belt level.  As long as something like stiff elastic or a belt goes around your midsection, the Sticky is supposed to work.

Color me skeptical. But I ordered the holsters.

So, I got the holsters (1 for my Glock 19 and one for my S&W M&P 9) and loaded both weapons and put them in the holsters.  I tried the M&P first.  I used a standard gun belt at 3 o’clock, and bent over, jogged, twisted, turned, kicked my legs, you name it, I could not get that holster to displace.  Every time I drew from it, it worked flawlessly.

The Sticky Holster with a Glock 22

I did the same thing with the Glock 19.  It worked flawlessly for staying in place and drawing.  And it is absolutely the most comfortable concealed carry holster on the market, especially when seated or riding in a car.

“So, what’s the downside?”

You knew there was going to be a downside, didn’t you?

The downside is that it is almost impossible to re-holster without using both hands.  Thus, training with the holster in a class is probably out. You are not going to be able to do it. That’s especially true when you’re concealing in a pair of running shorts or jogging pants where the holster is held in place using the drawstring.  The drawstring collapses the holster at the top making reholstering an Olympic Challenge event.

But ignoring, for the moment, the fact that it is difficult to reholster, I am absolutely amazed at how good the holster really is.  And it gets better.

The Sticky Holster is available on Amazon for $26.95.  You read that right.  Here’s a link: https://www.amazon.com/Sticky-Holster-LG-6S-Semi-Auto-Handguns/dp/B007MQC6O8/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1548357592&sr=8-6&keywords=sticky+holster+lg-6

Try it; you’re sure to like it.

A New Range

Can life get any sweeter?  Auburn Alabama has a new firing range with programmable targets.  You can do charging drills, shoot-no-shoot drills, and a bunch of other stuff.  I hope to upload something to YouTube in the near future, but for now let me just say that the Firing Pin Shooting Sports range is awesome!

Anti Semites and Twitter

The censorship on Twitter has become more about suppressing conservative thought and has little if anything to do about protecting people’s Twitter experience.  Olberman, Rosie, Alyssa Milano, Michael Moore and a host of others hurl invective and profanity around like there was no tomorrow.  These cretins never get their account features limited. Their racism, sexism and anti-semitism is an acceptable form of free expression to Twitter.  Yay First Amendment!  Go get ’em Rosie!

But let someone say something ugly about the Poor Palestinians (yeah, you know, the ones firing rockets into kindergartens in Israel) and suddenly the gloves come off.  We can’t have you spreading the truth about the Poor Palestinians.  They are so oppressed! Break out the crying towel, or the prayer rug, or something.

On June 2nd I posted a tweet where I expressed the view that the IDF should simply give the Hamas rioters what they wanted, martyrdom.  Not only does that thin the herd in the immediate time frame, but it also reduces the gene pool of extremists going forward.  Think of it as anti-social Darwinism if you want.  That’s my view.  If you’re trying to kill Israelis (and that’s what they were doing) then you should absolutely be fair game for someone to kill you.  Israelis have a right of self defense.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.  Here’s Your Darwin Award!

Twitter must not agree, because my account privileges were limited for a period of either 12 hours or 1 hour and 57 minutes depending upon whom you believe.  The original message said 12 hours, but when I deleted the message it said it would restore me in one hour and 57 minutes.  I don’t know who to believe, and I really don’t care. I am pretty sure I can find something to do with myself for the remainder of the evening.  But, come on, a tweet on June 2 gets pinged on June 7?

Here’s what happened. Some Palestinian Snowflake who believes every bit of fecal matter spewed by that festering pot of anti-semitism that is Hamas saw my response to Bernie Sanders. He posted a video from the Poor Palestinians about how maligned they were, and how we shouldn’t believe anything Israel says.  They don’t have food.  They don’t have water.  They don’t have medicine.

Oh bullshit!  Cry me a river dude.  Maybe if you weren’t rioting 24/7 and setting fields on fire with kamikaze kites, maybe, just maybe, you’d be able to find a way to live in peace with the Israelis.  Maybe they’d let trucks with medicine in if you weren’t also hauling in rockets, rifles and ammo.  I’m just saying… its a thought, huh?

But, of course, that’s not what they want.  They have only the intention of destroying Israel.  That’s what they want to do.  That’s what they mean to do.  And they think they should have catered meals and spa nails courtesy of the Israelis in the meantime.

So, maybe my tweet was in bad taste.  Check out any tweet from Rosie and see if mine was worse.  Not gonna happen.

No, the bottom line is that Twitter is letting the tail wag the dog.  The Snowflakes rule.  The time has probably come for me to get on Gab and stay on Gab so that I don’t have to deal with rebukes from people whose IQ can be measured in negative numbers, and who hate Jews for the sole reason that they are Jewish.

And, by the way…I’m not Jewish.  I’m just a guy who understands fairness.

Disproportionate, Hell!

We’ve all had that annoying little brother or sister that just couldn’t leave us alone.  They’d poke at us, kick us under the table, pinch us, even bite us, and as the older brother we were expected not to retaliate. But there’s only so much crap a person can take, and so when they pushed it too far, we’d smack ‘em.  No bruises, no broken bones, just a not-so-polite smack upside the head to let them know they’d crossed the line.

And what happened?

“MOM!  HE HIT ME!”

Mom, who of course was not paying attention because The Young and the Stupid was on television (and Kate was busy explaining to Jim how she was forced into the affair with Fred, because Fred knew she was previously a left-handed lesbian, and that was why it was alright for Jim to have sex with Miranda).  Mom sees the human ambulance siren wailing and immediately assumes we’re in the wrong.  We try to explain, but we always heard “two wrongs don’t make a right.”

No, but they do make a point.  And the next time the little bugger decided to stir up some shit, we raised that smacking hand and sure enough, they slunk away, not wanting to receive their just desserts.  This because they knew that even with Mom sending us to our room “to think about your bad behavior” we were still more than capable of dishing it out again.  And as we’d subtly remind them, “you have to sleep sometime….”

Okay, so I was a terrible big brother, but the point is just this.  Sometimes you actually have to resort to violence to stop violence.  And the new game in town is for antagonists to claim that a response was “disproportionate” to the violence they dished out.  It isn’t, and that’s the point.

Let’s take what happened in Ferguson, Missouri for example.  You have a big thug, one with a history of gang activity, strong-arm robbing a grocery store, and then trying to disarm a police officer.  In that attempt he made the bad decision to charge a cop that he outweighed by 100 pounds, and as a result he was shot and killed.

Then there were riots. And the big bowl of jello that was the Missouri Governor (who thankfully did not become Missouri’s senator) sent in the Highway Patrol with handcuffs…for the police.  They allowed a bunch of radicals to burn down a large chunk of a city.

Now you tell me. Whose response was disproportionate there?

It may be that racism played a role in the shooting. I don’t pretend to know.  I know that if a white guy that size tried to take my gun away and then charged me, he’d be dead too. It may be that blacks in Ferguson were treated unfairly for years.  I am sure the latter is probably true based on statistics and the way the Municipal Court system worked.  But you change those through political action, not violence. But violence is easier, requires less thought, and apparently is more fun.  So we had an entire summer and half the next year, until the Criminal in the Pantsuit was defeated, with leftists of every stripe telling anyone who would listen that all white people were racist.

Then what happened? Heard of Black Lives Matter recently? Of course not: there is no election to be swayed through racism just yet.  Look for additional agitation near August/September and for more attempts to obtain a disproportionate response.  Because, that’s what the game is.  Create martyrs.

All of the foregoing, however, is meant to convey a message.  You cannot agitate, wage violence, and then expect to get a slap on the wrist and your popsicle taken away.  Yet amazingly, in spite of terrorists armed with small arms, bombs, Molotov cocktails, fire-dropping kites, and rocks the size of tea kettles being thrown at Israelis, we expect the Israelis to say “bad dog, no biscuit,” instead of actually taking care of the problem.  But Israel isn’t so stupid.

Here is the Israeli security situation borrowed from the website at the bottom of the graphic:

Screen Shot 2018-05-15 at 10.08.54 AM

As you can see, nearly every region in Israel is under rocket attack threat, and if you look at Jerusalem, Israel’s capital is ringed in on three sides by hostile forces.  The security fence where the shootings occurred are very close to population centers, and Facebook allowed Palestinians to post messages urging each other to invade and kill Israelis.  Here is one drawing showing the fence and its location vis a vis population centers:Screen Shot 2018-05-15 at 10.12.00 AM

The IDF can read. They warned the Palestinians that if they took that terror tactic, they’d be killed.  So when someone came across that line, or moved to assault an IDF soldier, plant a bomb, or engage in other violence, they were killed.  58 were dead at last count, which is an amazingly small number given the violence they tried to inflict.

Yet the international media blames Israel and Trump.

It should place the burden on Hamas to explain why its “mostly peaceful protesters” were carrying small arms, bombs, firebombs, etc.

You see, protesters carry signs, chant slogans, and generally make a pest of themselves, but they do not engage in violence.  If you engage in violence, you deserve to receive violence returned to you.  That’s how you stop violence!

Given that there were more than 100,000 protesters out there, and that hundreds if not thousands tried to come through the wire, 58 dead demonstrates remarkable restraint. Because if those “mostly peaceful protesters” had overrun the wire, and gotten into the populated areas of Israel, the body count would have been much higher.  Only it would have been innocent Israelis, not devil-worshipping terrorists that would be bleeding out in the streets.

So, I commend Israeli marksmanship.  Way to go fellas!

The Compromise Deception

You are Being Deceived

As gun owners we are told we need to compromise.  Compromise is not always a bad word.  Suppose Lawmaker A wants to raise your taxes by 10% to pay for needed infrastructure improvement. Lawmaker B wants to lower your taxes by 5% and pay for infrastructure improvements by cutting the budget in areas where there is rampant waste and abuse.  Let’s suppose that the infrastructure improvements are actually needed and not a give-away to some political pal.  Let’s further assume that there is waste in government (hardly a stretch!) and that a 5% tax cut would be a welcome idea.  Is there room for compromise?

As a lawyer, I see this kind of negotiation six or seven times a year with cases.  The Defendant knows or suspects he will lose at trial, and doesn’t want to pay the $350,000 that the Plaintiff is demanding.  So he pokes as many holes in the case as possible and goes to mediation crowing about the plaintiff (a 65 year old grandmother) being “a lying snake.”  The plaintiff knows that even with the best jury they could lose, and that there is little likelihood that they will get $350K.  So the start exchanging offers and responses and the case settles for $200,000.  Both sides buy their peace.

In the legislative example, both sides try to build coalitions and the final bill comes out with a 2% tax increase and budget cuts in other areas.  If we look at these situations graphically what we have is tension between two competing goals (infrastructure improvement and fiscal responsibility) and the tension is resolved through “compromise.” Slide1

That’s because both positions are reasonable and supportable, and neither position violates the Constitution or any higher laws.  Compromise is not only possible here, it’s a great way to make sure that the greatest good gets done for the greatest number.  But it also assumes that everyone on both sides is acting in good faith, without a hidden agenda.  In the gun debate, that is not the case.

There is a popular metaphor about the frog in the water.  If you put the frog in a pot of boiling water it jumps out.  If you put it in room temperature water and heat it slowly, the frog boils to death eventually.  For the moment, accept the metaphor’s basis (even though there is no scientific basis for the metaphor: the frog jumps out).  The metaphor illustrates that incremental changes over time produce the same end result as sudden changes implemented immediately, just with less public outcry.  Except, of course, for the canaries in the coal mines: the parties actually aware of the hidden agendas.

This is the problem with the gun control debate.  The public assumes that there is a valid argument for limiting ownership of certain types of weapons, and that same public likely has never read the Second Amendment.  So, when they hear “we need to ban assault weapons,” there are a series of thoughts that go through their heads:

  • Assault sounds really ugly.
  • Weapons are used to hurt people; not like hunting rifles.
  • Lots of people have been killed, we need to do something.

What the public does not do, however, is actually think critically about what they’re being told. Common sporting rifles like the AR-15 and the AK-47 are not assault weapons.  Assault weapons are weapons capable of automatic fire: bullets keep firing until you release the trigger.  Sporting rifles fire one bullet per trigger pull.  Unfortunately, and in spite of nearly every gun advocate screaming about it, the media keeps using the term “automatic” instead of semi-automatic. The distinction is critical.  An “automatic weapon” is automatic because both the loading and firing of the weapon are automated. A “semi-automatic” automates only the loading of the next round. The lazy media use the word “automatic” relentlessly either out of stupidity or malevolence: take your pick.

If the public thought critically they might wonder when when they go into the sporting goods store there is not a sign that advertises “assault weapons.”  That’s because to get one, you need a tax stamp from the ATF, and you have to have some reason for a weapon that is effectively a weapon of war. But they see a scary black rifle and they automatically think “the only purpose that has is to kill people.”

And, of course, that’s wrong.  They’re fun to shoot, cheaper to shoot than other rifles, and useful in hog hunting, deer hunting, and varmint hunting.  Equipped with an EOTech sight, they are an excellent tool for getting rid of everything from snakes to coyotes.  Yet, the media tries very hard not to tell anyone that, because that goes against the “scary assault weapon” narrative.  The fact that the weapon is underpowered when considered next to a .308, 30-30, or even a 45-70, matters not to the people who are paid to deceive.

The same people are paid to offer up this “compromise” narrative.  The narrative goes something like this:

  • We want to have a “conversation.”
  • We are willing to “compromise” on reasonable regulations.
  • Why won’t the NRA members compromise with us?

And the reason is clear. The Second Amendment is hard-wired into the Constitution because our forefathers saw the need to arm citizens against the power of government.  There is absolutely no competing, reasonable principle on the other side.  All competing principles are in fact antagonistic to the Constitution. This can be represented graphically as follows:Slide2

Our forefathers were brilliant and wise.  They knew that power corrupted, and that absolute power corrupted absolutely.  So they armed every citizen.  Over the years, we’ve lost sight of the fact that guns help ensure that no one person, or group of persons, can thwart the will of the people.  Missouri, in fact, has as its motto “Let the will of the people be the supreme law of the land.”  A great motto, and an appropriate sentiment in this discussion.

Here is the problem with the left’s “compromise” narrative.  It has a ratcheting effect, sort of like a boa constrictor.  Every time we breathe out, they tighten up.

Background checks are needed, we have to have them, compromise with us!

            We did.  And what did it get us.  It got us a system that doesn’t work, and doesn’t stop people like Nicholas Cruz.  So, what’s the Left’s response:

Background checks on new guns won’t do enough, we need “universal” background checks!

            Uh, no.  You haven’t shown us that any of these shootings were done with weapons acquired outside the current system.  And we want national conceal carry reciprocity.

 YOU WON’T COMPROMISE WITH US! YOU HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS.  YOU’RE EVIL!!

See the deception?  They only want to compromise when we give up something.

In essence, we give up our rights, and all they do is take more rights.  Like most every other gun owner other than the ones deceived by the leftist rhetoric, I am tired of having my rights stripped.  I am tired of seeing rights taken with no analysis of whether the rights-depriving measures actually work.  I am tired of when those measures do not work, and do not stop the carnage, that the next “solution” is more draconian regulation aimed not at the evildoer, but the common citizen.  It’s almost like the left recognizes that criminals don’t obey the law, and that their goal is not “reasonable regulation” but rather, outright confiscation.

To the left, it is reasonable to ban AR-15s because they look scary, not because they are the most powerful rifle.  To the left, it is reasonable to require all gun sales, even between father and son, uncle and nephew, etc., to be background checked.  But the real goal of these “universal background checks” is a national firearms registry.  The left knows that criminals don’t go through the system, they steal them, or buy them from other criminals.  And it’s worth noting that when New York passed its draconian law outlawing weapons with more than 5 rounds in the magazine, New York used its gun registration lists to go after the owners and confiscate the weapons.

No more.  We have our backs to the wall, and you can’t push us any further.  Do not fall for the “we need to compromise” deception. It will not stop with that compromise.  It will not stop until you are disarmed, and no longer a citizen, but a subject.

Day 3 – Saturday – NRA Dallas

The morning dawned bright and dry today here in Dallas.IMG_3728

The Exhibit Hall opened at 9 am today, and I spent most of the day wandering around it looking at all the various offerings.  Some of them were quite novel, and some were overpriced.  But by and large it was a very good day.

IMG_3729

One interesting item is the Ammo Armor fired to protect us from “dirty magazines.”  The TSA requires that ammunition be in a covered condition such that the primers cannot be struck.  This product satisfies that need, and they are quite inexpensive at $10 a cover.  I got two!

The next Item I found worth buying was this Bore Sticks package for a 9 mm handgun.  The bore sticks can be pushed or pulled through a pistol or rifle (the demonstrator was using a rifle barrel and an AR bolt carrier group) and the product is lint free.  It can be used to clean and lube a pistol or rifle.  I would suggest going to their website and looking at their videos.  This is an interesting product.

Ammo-Up is another interesting product.  It’s designed to solve that problem at the range where you have to police your own brass.  No one likes raking and shoveling and sifting. This product eliminates that.  It mops up the brass inside the device, and with a flick of the level, deposits the brass into a bucket. They have the small size pictured here, as well as the larger size (shown behind it).  The smaller unit is $59, while the larger one is $350. It is an excellent tool for those who maintain ranges, as well as those of us who are forced to collect our own brass.  And of course, if you reload and want brass others leave behind, it’s an efficient way to collect it.

Although I did not buy one, El Paso Saddlery produced some excellent tooled leather holsters that were works of art.  They were on full display at the NRA, and they had lots of traffic at their booth.  They would be a good choice for a hand-made custom holster for someone you care about.

5.11 Tactical was in its booth, and it was serving Black Rifle Coffee Company coffee there.  This was in addition to all the different products they offered.  I picked up a small sling pack, and a pair of jeans.  But one of the things that impressed me most about this company is the fact that the Flag goes over the door, and they remain committed not only to the NRA, but to the tactical folks who use and rely on their gear.  I love 5.11, and I wear it whenever I go shooting.IMG_3744

Olympian Julie Golob was in the Smith and Wesson booth greeting folks.  She is a sweet young lady who won gold at the Olympics this past year.  She was a delight to listen to as she discussed her shooting.IMG_3746

As in years past Daniel Defense drew a huge crowd to its booth as it gave away two of its AR platform rifles.  It was standing room only around the booth, and Daniel Defense did not disappoint.  Mixing just the right amount of showmanship and generosity, they weren’t satisfied giving away the one rifle they promised; they gave away a second one too.  Big kudos to Daniel Defense.

Now on to two products I did buy and why I got them.

Several years ago I got an Urban Carry holster basically because the videos made it look like a great way to carry.  I found I could not carry using the device because it was simply too kludgy to draw from.  I am sure it works for skinnier people, but for me, it did not work.  Not even a little.

Enter the Ultimate Concealment Holster.IMG_3758

Designed better than the Urban Carry, the holster features a cell phone case that goes on the outside of the pants, and that serves as a handle for drawing the firearm.  Videos on the website make it easy to learn how to use the holster, and I found the instruction I received at the NRAAM to be very helpful too.  This is an excellent deep concealment option for folks who are not scared of AIWB carry, and who can learn to follow a simple set of steps to draw.  It’s not as fast as a kydex on the right hip, but it is much more concealed, and much better for getting into and around in areas where the property owner might not want you carrying.

I have mentioned on here several times how hard it is to find a holster that will fit a Sig P320RX with the Romeo sight.  The Q series grabs on to the trigger guard of the pistol, clips on to the belt for IWB carry, and doesn’t interfere with the Romeo Sight.

IMG_3757

I did not bring my P320 to the show, but I intend to report back when I get home on how well this option worked out.

That’s the update from the NRAAM today.

Rest well America.  Your freedoms are safe.

NRA Meeting – Day 2

Today was the day that everyone came for.  It was part revival meeting, part cheerleading session.  It was the NRA doing what the NRA does best.

Constitutional Law

The day started for me at 8 a.m. at the Firearms Law Seminar at the Hyatt.  This is an annual event that the NRA has for firearms-interested lawyers and it provides Continuing Legal Education credit for the attendees.  It began with an excellent summary by Professor O’Shea of the current state of Constitutional Law.  This alone was worth the price of admission.  O’Shea contextualized things very well, and provided insights that were useful.  And, there were lots of lawyers present.

IMG_3707

Professor Goldstein took over next discussing the Fourth Amendment and Justice Gorsuch’s jurisprudence.  Again, it was an opportunity to learn something about an area of law where I seldom practice.  The materials were given out on jump drives.  It was a great start to a very busy day.

The Convention Center

It rained this morning in Dallas, and so I took the bus back to the Convention Center.  At the center I found this rather interesting balloon sculpture.

IMG_3705

Of note, the US Border Patrol was there recruiting NRA members, which ought to tell you something about whose opinions they value.  In addition, there were lots of other vendors and groups outside the exhibit hall offering different items.  And of course, the NRA Store remained open (which was a good thing: I had to buy a sweatshirt to keep the rain off me while I put my pistol in the car).

The Massive Protest Demonstration …..(not)

Of course, no NRA meeting would be complete without the hell hounds from Mom’s Demand around to protest.  I can’t wait to see the coverage tomorrow because the protesters were less than impressive.  At the opening of the meeting this is the HUGE group of protesters that was in place:

IMG_3709

Yep, that’s right, four of them.  The protesters kept switching signs.  And when I would get up close enough to them to take a photo (and could avoid the police who were trying to keep things civil), the cowards would put their signs up over their face.  This leads me to believe that the protesters were probably paid temp workers hired by Bloomberg’s Moneybags Demand group being PAID to protest.  Even these employees wanted no part of their actions!

The Leadership Forum

I got in line for the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum at 11 a.m, knowing that we’d have to clear security to get to see the President and Vice President.  I met a great guy named Randy and we walked in line together about half a mile from where the line started to the point where we were being admitted to the Arena.  I had come prepared with a wallet and camera and nothing else.  I cleared security easily.  Lots of people with keychain pocketknives did not.  The line, by the way, was massive.

IMG_3710

We got in about 11:40, and the NRA videos were already playing.  Every time I see Dana, Bongino, Stinchfield, and Noir take their rhetoric right up the ass of the liberal cowards, I am reminded of what my dues to the NRA actually buy: a voice that cannot, will not be silenced.  A voice for truth.

Lt. Col. Oliver North gave the invocation (he is always terrific) and the pledge of allegiance and the national anthem followed.  It always chokes me up to hear those words, and the singer was lovely.  It made my heart swell with American Pride to hear those words done so artfully.

Chris Cox then get things started with a bit of a cheering session.  He announced that for the first time in 147 years the NRA had both the sitting vice president and the president at its annual meeting.   Cox then called out Stephen Willeford, the hero of Sutherland Springs, and asked him to speak.  His message was simple: I did no more than what any one of you would have done.  I ran toward trouble because I’m a sheepdog.  Be sheepdogs!  He then thanked his Shepard (Jesus Christ) for protecting him that day.  The NRA gave him both a Texas Stock Certificate as well as a Life Membership to the NRA.  It was nicely done.

Of the politicians, Pence spoke first, and revealed something I did not know: he is a card-carrying member of the NRA.  That impressed me.  He gave a rousing speech that also impressed me.  He talked about visiting with the families of Sutherland Springs in the days and hours after the tragedy, and how their firm belief in God and faith in each other brought a perspective of hope to him and his wife, Karen.  He spoke about the need to protect schools with real security, not security that makes us feel like we’re doing something.  He talked about the need to stop violent video games and the rampant disrespect for human life that permeates games that reward killing.  He talked about the need to protect the unborn.  Pence was the leader of the revival meeting.  He left me feeling good about the office of head of state.  It is my firm hope that he follows President Trump to the Oval Office in 2024.  And not before!

Then it was time to bring out the master showman.  IMG_3712

Mr. Trump walked on stage to raucous applause.  The building practically shook with the love being thrown out by all those in attendance.  His words did not disappoint.  He was flamboyant, direct, colorful, and funny as hell at points.  He lampooned everyone from Hillary to John Kerry, whom he described as someone who should never have entered a bike race at 73.  He promised to build the Wall.  He promised to get tough on immigration.  He again assured us our gun rights were safe, and then ended with saying that we needed to help ensure that we keep Republicans in Congress if we want to see that agenda move forward.  It was a call to action, and I am pretty sure that all of us in attendance knew we needed to invest both time and money on the mid-terms.

The Exhibits

Other speakers followed, including Wayne LaPierre and Dana Loesch.  They were all good, all motivational, all directly on point.  I did not stay for most of them because I wanted to get to the Exhibit Hall.  And Wow!  What an exhibit hall!

One of the things that really amazes me about folks who work in the firearms industry is how darned clever and innovative they are.  In support of that I offer, as exhibit 1, the SnagMag spare ammo carrier.

IMG_3726

The SnagMag hooks on the outside of your pocket while dropping into the well of your pocket.  It is cleverly designed so that when you slide your index finger down the side of the magazine and pull up and back, a hook on the SnagMag grips your pocket, keeping the holder in the pocket, while your index finger pulls the magazine out and you are already indexed to the magazine for a magazine change.IMG_3725

This image with the circle shows the hook that “snags” the mag carrier on your pocket.  It is an innovative design.  And the president of the company asked me to pass along the code shown in the first photo above.  People who go to the website (SnagMag.com) and purchase a SnagMag will get at 20% discount with that code.

Another company displaying their wares at the NRAAM is 1791, the holster company that makes premium leather holsters.  The great thing about these holsters is not only are they good holsters that hold the most commonly available weapons, they’re sold by good people.  Here is the IWB I purchased for my Smith and Wesson M&P 2.0 9 mm.

They unfortunately do not have a holster that fits the Sig P320RX with the Romeo sight, but then again, neither does Aliengear.  I hope tomorrow to find a manufacturer that does support that weapon, and if so, will report here.

After a full day of browsing the Exhibit Hall, I found I had missed the larger part of the Exhibit Hall at the far other end of the Convention Center.  I hope to be able to bring you finds from there tomorrow.

Good night America.  Sleep well. Freedom is in the hands of the NRA, and we never sleep.